Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors associated with receipt of quality contraceptive counselling among adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa

From: Access to quality contraceptive counselling among adolescent girls and young women in sub-Saharan Africa

Variable

Model O

Empty model

Model I

AOR [95% CI]

Model II

AOR [95% CI]

Model III

AOR [95% CI]

Age (years)

    

15–19

 

1.00

 

1.00

20–24

 

1.47*** [1.31, 1.65]

 

1.48*** [1.32, 1.67]

Level of education

    

No education

 

1.00

 

1.00

Primary

 

1.15 [0.97, 1.35]

 

1.32** [1.11, 1.57]

Secondary or higher

 

1.19* [1.01, 1.42]

 

1.31** [1.09, 1.58]

Marital status

    

Never in union

 

1.00

 

1.00

Married

 

1.42*** [1.24, 1.62]

 

1.32*** [1.15, 1.52]

Cohabiting

 

1.24** [1.06, 1.46]

 

1.47*** [1.23, 1.76]

Previously married

 

1.36** [1.12, 1.67]

 

1.48*** [1.20, 1.83]

Current working status

    

Not working

 

1.00

 

1.00

Working

 

1.12* [1.01, 1.25]

 

1.22*** [1.09, 1.37]

Read newspaper or magazine

   

No

 

1.00

 

1.00

Yes

 

0.86* [0.76, 0.97]

 

0.91 [0.80, 1.04]

Watch television

    

No

 

1.00

 

1.00

Yes

 

0.92 [0.82, 1.03]

 

0.94 [0.84, 1.07]

Heard of family planning from radio last few months

   

No

 

1.00

 

1.00

Yes

 

1.29*** [1.16, 1.43]

 

1.34*** [1.21, 1.50]

Usage of internet

    

No

 

1.00

 

1.00

Yes

 

0.80** [0.70, 0.92]

 

0.78** [0.67, 0.91]

Getting medical help for self: Permission to go

   

Not a big problem

 

1.00

 

1.00

Big problem

 

0.80** [0.69, 0.93]

 

0.83* [0.72, 0.97]

Getting medical help for self: Getting money for treatment

  

Not a big problem

 

1.00

 

1.00

Big problem

 

0.96 [0.86, 1.07]

 

1.02 [0.92, 1.14]

Getting medical help for self: Not wanting to go alone

   

Not a big problem

 

1.00

 

1.00

Big problem

 

0.76*** [0.67, 0.86]

 

0.79*** [0.70, 0.89]

Visited health facility last 12 months

    

No

 

1.00

 

1.00

Yes

 

1.64*** [1.47, 1.82]

 

1.69*** [1.52, 1.88]

Sex of household head

    

Male

  

1.00

1.00

Female

  

0.86** [0.77, 0.95]

0.94 [0.84, 1.06]

Wealth index

    

Poorest

  

1.00

1.00

Poorer

  

0.94 [0.80, 1.10]

0.93 [0.79, 1.09]

Middle

  

0.82* [0.70, 0.95]

0.80** [0.68, 0.94]

Richer

  

0.90 [0.76, 1.06]

0.89 [0.75, 1.06]

Richest

  

0.76** [0.63, 0.93]

0.80* [0.64, 0.99]

Place of residence

    

Urban

  

1.00

1.00

Rural

  

0.90 [0.78, 1.04]

0.85* [0.73, 0.99]

Sub-region

    

Central

  

1.00

1.00

Southern

  

5.73*** [4.44, 7.41]

5.01*** [3.86, 6.51]

Eastern

  

3.61*** [2.80, 4.65]

2.54*** [1.96, 3.30]

Western

  

4.00*** [3.13, 5.13]

4.09*** [3.19, 5.25]

Random effect model

    

PSU variance (95% CI)

6.019 [5.025, 7.212]

5.166 [4.277, 6.238]

6.116 [5.101, 7.335]

5.656 [4.707, 6.796]

ICC

0.647

0.611

0.650

0.632

Wald chi-square

Reference

422.18 (< 0.001)

218.72 (< 0.001)

618.47 (< 0.001)

Model fitness

    

Log-likelihood

-183281.65

-177142.64

-179032.75

-173,312

AIC

366567.3

354319.3

358087.5

346,676

N

19,398

19,398

19,398

19,398

Number of clusters

1,104

1,104

1,104

1,104

  1. aOR = adjusted odds ratios; CI = Confidence Interval; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; 1.00 = Reference category; PSU = Primary Sampling Unit; ICC = Intra-Cluster Correlation Coefficient; AIC = Akaike Information Criterion