|
Characteristics (N = 58)
|
CMA (N = 29)
|
NMT (N = 29)
|
Fisher’s Exact Test
|
|---|
|
#LNG implant placed prior to training
|
|
0
|
16 (55.2)
|
8 (27.6)
|
0.024
|
|
1–10
|
8 (27.6)
|
8 (27.6)
|
|
11–20
|
4 (13.8)
|
3 (10.3)
|
|
21–100
|
0 (0.0)
|
6 (20.7)
|
|
> 100
|
1 (3.5)
|
4 (13.8)
|
|
#LNG implant placed during training
|
|
0
|
1 (3.5)
|
7 (24.1)
|
0.037
|
|
1
|
13 (44.8)
|
8 (27.6)
|
|
2
|
6 (20.7)
|
8 (27.6)
|
|
3
|
6 (20.7)
|
1 (3.5)
|
|
4
|
3 (10.3)
|
3 (10.3)
|
|
5
|
0 (0.0)
|
2 (6.9)
|
|
#LNG implant placed since training
|
|
0–10
|
6 (20.7)
|
7 (24.1)
|
0.785
|
|
11–20
|
13 (44.8)
|
15 (51.7)
|
|
> 21
|
10 (34.5)
|
7 (24.1)
|
|
Mean LNG implant insertion score
| | | |
|
< 80%
|
0 (0.0)
|
2 (6.9)
|
0.088
|
|
81–85%
|
3 (10.3)
|
2 (6.9)
|
|
86–90%
|
10 (34.5)
|
8 (27.6)
|
|
91–95%
|
15 (51.7)
|
10 (34.5)
|
|
96–100%
|
1 (3.5)
|
7 (24.1)
|
- There was no significant difference between CMA and NMT mean LNG implant scores during the monitoring visit (p = 0.088). 89.7% of CMAs had an average LNG implant insertion score above the MoH competency score of 85%, while 86.2% of NMTs had an average LNG implant insertion score above the MoH competency score of 85%
