Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of all studies

From: Why does uptake of family planning services remain sub-optimal among Nigerian women? A systematic review of challenges and implications for policy

Author/Year of publication

Type of study

Location of study

Uptake/contraceptive prevalence

Factors/challenges to uptake

Oye-Adeniran/2006 [22]

Cross-sectional study

Anambra, Oyo, Kaduna & Bauchi

22.1%

Client and Health service related

Okanlawon/2010 [23]

Cross-sectional

Ogun

31.6%

Client and Health service related

Nwachukwu/2008 [15]

Cross sectional

Imo

29.7%

Client related and Health service related

Umoh/2011 [29]

Cross-sectional

Akwa-Ibom

52.6%

Client related

Idris/2013 [21]

Crosss-sectional

Kaduna

14%

Client related

Asekun-Olarinmoye/2013 [24]

Cross-sectional study

Osun

13.1%

Client related

Eluwa/2016 [20]

Cross-sectional

Anambra, Abia, Delta, Ebonyi, Edo, Enugu

41%

Client related

Ugboaja/2011 [31]

Cross-sectional

Anambra

44%

Client related

Egede/2015 [13]

Cross-sectional

Ebonyi

28.3%

Client related

Adebayo/2016 [35]

Cross-sectional

Ondo

66.8%

Client related

Durowade/2017 [17]

Cross-sectional

Ekiti

50.5%

Client related

Solanke/2017 [37]

Cross-sectional study (secondary data analysis)

Nigeria

19.8%

Client related

Etokidem/2017 [30]

Cross-sectional

Cross-River

17.2%

Client related

Okigbo/2014 [16]

Cross sectional

Cross River

25.9% (among ART clients), 15.8%(among HCT clients)

Client Related

Adebowale 2011 [36]

Cross sectional (Secondary data analysis)

Nigeria

26%

Client Related

Schwandt/2017 [14]

Cross-sectional

Abuja, Benin, Ibadan, Ilorin, Kaduna, Zaria

NA

Health service related

Akamike/ 2019 [32]

Quasi-experimental

Ebonyi

9.9% in intervention arm, 12.8% in control arm

Client and Health Service related

Abiodun /2015 [33]

Cross sectional

Ogun

54.1% (EC)

Client related

Adefalu/2019 [27]

Qualitative

Kebbi and Sokoto

NA

Client and Health service related

Adeyemi/2016 [34]

Cross sectional

Oyo

25.4%

Client related

Bishwajit/2018 [38]

Secondary data Analysis

Nigeria

16%

Client Related

Chimah/ 2016 [18]

Cross sectional

Lagos

31.1%

Client related

Johnson 2/017[39]

Secondary data analysis

Nigeria

10.3%

Client related

Omo-Aghoja/2009 [19]

Cross sectional

Delta

29%

Client related

Sinai /2019 [28]

Qualitative

Kaduna

NA

Client and health service related

Ankomah /2013 [40]

Qualitative

13 States in Nigeria

NA

Client and Health worker related

Aransiola /2014 [41]

Qualitative

Ibadan and Kaduna

NA

Client related

  1. EC Emergency contraception, ART Antiretroviral, HCT HIV counseling & Testing.