Skip to main content

Table 1 Itemized costs (2022 $US) and proportions used in the analysis

From: Cost-effectiveness of increased contraceptive coverage using family planning benefits cards compared with the standard of care for young women in Uganda

Cost categorya

Per person cost [Low, High]

 

Reference

FPBC

SOC

Personnel (FPBC)

116 (58-174)

116 (58-174)

Primary study

Medical personnel time

2 (1-3)

2 (1-3)

Primary study

Training CHWs

9 (4-13)

4 (2-6)

Primary study

Administration

25 (13-38)

–

Primary study

Equipment

4 (2-7)

4 (2-6)

Primary study

Overhead

37 (19-56)

37 (19-56)

Primary study

Childcare

–

–

Primary study

Lost productivity

2 (1 - 3)

1 (0.5 - 1.5)

Primary study

Proportion of users for each modern contraception method, %b

 Emergency Contraception

0.06 (0.04-0.10)

0.01 (0.02 - 0.33)

Primary study

 Implants

0.17 (0.13-0.22)

0.07 (0.04 - 0.12)

Primary study

 Injectables

0.43 (0.37-0.49)

0.52 (0.46 - 0.58)

Primary study

 IUDs

0.08 (0.05-0.12)

0.01 (0.02 - 0.33)

Primary study

 Male condoms

0.04 (0.02-0.07)

0.08 (0.05 - 0.12)

Primary study

 Pills

0.21 (0.16-0.27)

0.30 (0.25 - 0.36)

Primary study

  1. aCost ranges represent +/− 50% of each cost
  2. bProportion ranges are based on the lower and upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval