Table 5 Adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHR) using Cox-regression analysis for exploring the risk factors against PPIUCD Discontinuation at six months
Total | Retention at six months | P-value | Adjusted HR (95% CI) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 180(100) | 118(65.6) | |||
Age of the women | 0.386 | ||||
< 26 years | 26(100) | 15(57.7) | Ref. | ||
26–35 years | 136(100) | 89(65.4) | 1.1 (0.5–1.9) | 0.908 | |
> 35 years | 18(100) | 14(77.8) | 0.860 | 0.5 (0.2–1.8) | 0.333 |
Education | |||||
Not Educated | 25(100) | 16(64) | Ref. | ||
Educated | 155(100) | 102(65.8) | 0.6 (0.4–0.8) | < 0.01 | |
Occupation | 0.026 | ||||
Housewives | 136(100) | 83(61) | Ref. | ||
Employed | 28(100) | 20(71.4) | 0.6 (0.3–1.3) | 0.229 | |
Others | 16(100) | 15(93.8) | 0.1 (0.1–0.8) | 0.026 | |
Socio-economic Status | 0.305 | ||||
Poorest | 23(100) | 14(60.9) | Ref. | ||
Lower middle | 59(100) | 35(59.3) | 0.9 (0.4–2.1) | 0.945 | |
Upper middle | 43(100) | 33(76.7) | 0.4 (0.2–0.9) | 0.048 | |
Richest | 55(100) | 36(65.5) | 0.7 (0.3–1.5) | 0.383 | |
Religion | < 0.01 | ||||
Hindu | 114(100) | 80(70.2) | Ref. | ||
Non-Hindu | 66(100) | 38(57.6) | 1.7 (1.1–2.7) | 0.049 | |
Residence | 0.805 | ||||
Rural | 69(100) | 46(66.7) | Ref. | ||
Urban | 111(100) | 72(64.9) | 0.8 (0.5–1.4) | 0.410 | |
Family Planning methods usage in past | 0.199 | ||||
No | 42(100) | 31(73.8) | Ref. | ||
Yes | 138(100) | 87(63) | 1.6 (0.8-3.0) | 0.142 | |
Period of counselling | 0.004 | ||||
Antenatal | 106(100) | 70(66) | Ref. | ||
Intrapartum | 23(100) | 11(47.8) | 2.0 (1.4–3.9) | 0.035 | |
Immediate postpartum | 51(100) | 37(72.5) | 0.8 (0.4–1.7) | 0.649 | |
Time since Last Childbirth | 0.497 | ||||
NA (Primigravida) | 110(100) | 70(63.6) | Ref. | ||
Up to 3 years | 70(100) | 48(68.6) | 0.8 (0.4–1.7) | 0.649 | |
Mode delivery | 0.329 | ||||
Caesarean Section | 102(100) | 71(69.6) | Ref. | ||
Instrumental (assisted) | 34(100) | 19(55.9) | 1.2 (0.7–2.3) | 0.417 | |
Normal vaginal delivery | 44(100) | 28(63.6) | 1.7 (1.2–3.3) | 0.045 |