Skip to main content

Table 2 Primary and secondary outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in the studied groups by two different analytical approaches

From: Comparison of luteal phase stimulation with follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian response: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial

Variable

Intention to treat

Undergoing oocyte pick-up

LPOS, N = 31

FPOS, N = 33

P value

LPOS, N = 23

FPOS, N = 25

P value

Total number of oocytes retrieved

3 (0–8)

2.5 (0–6)

0.078

4 (0–8)

4 (0–6)

0.081

Number of MII oocyte

3 (0–8)

2 (0–5)

0.041*

3 (0–8)

2 (0–5)

0.07

Number of MI oocyte

0 (0–2)

0 (0–2)

0.539

0 (0–2)

1 (0–2)

0.518

Number of GV oocyte

0 (0–2)

0 (0–3)

0.623

0 (0–2)

0 (0–3)

0.559

Day 3 embryo development rate

45.5%

38.7%

0.585

60%

52.2%

0.196

Top-quality day 3 embryo

42.4%

25.8%

0.162

56.8%

34.8%

0.141

  1. FPOS follicular phase ovarian stimulation, MI Metaphase-I, MII Metaphase-II, LPOS Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation. The results were shown as median and range
  2. * Significant
  3. *P-value < 0.05