Skip to main content

Abortion attitudes, training, and experience among medical students in Jamaica, West Indies



To define abortion attitudes, training and experience among medical students in Jamaica, a restricted environment for legal abortion.


From September to November 2017 we conducted an anonymous online cross-sectional survey among medical students enrolled at the University of West Indies (UWI) in Jamaica. An abortion attitudes sum score was used for analysis. Multivariate regression was applied to evaluate the impact of characteristics and experiences on abortion attitudes.


The primary outcome was a validated composite abortion attitudes sum score, ranging from zero to forty-five. 1404 students completed the survey for a response rate of 88%. 64% had a positive attitude towards abortion. In multivariate analysis, medical students’ attitudes were favorably impacted by a prior personal or family experience with abortion, identifying as non-religious, being older in age and mixed raced. 1321 (94%) agreed that abortion training should be included in the medical school curriculum. 78.8% reported no abortion training and only 17.9% reported miscarriage management training.


Medical students at UWI had favorable attitudes towards abortion, despite their limited training in a restrictive environment. Prior personal experience with abortion and being non-religious were the strongest predictor of favorable attitudes. Increased training and clinical exposure may prove to be crucial in improving access of safe abortion.


Unsafe abortion contributes to maternal mortality in the Caribbean and Latin America. These regions also have the highest estimated annual abortion rates in the world, at 65 per 1000 women of childbearing age in 2014 [1]. In Jamaica, abortion is legally restricted and unsafe abortion is prevalent. According to the World Health Organization more than 22,000 abortions occurred in Jamaica in 2011 and complications ranked as the eighth leading cause of maternal mortality in country [2].

The abortion law in Jamaica originates from the “Offences against the Person Act of 1861” modified by the decision in the Rex v. Bourne case of 1938 to permit abortion for health reasons [3, 4]. Current interpretation of the law cites that abortion is indicated to preserve the physical and mental health of the mother; but does not include rape or incest, fetal impairment, economic or social indications, or contraceptive failure [2]. In order to obtain a legal abortion two physicians must agree that the abortion is necessary. In the face of these restrictions, illegal or unsafe abortions are prevalent [5]. Previous research has demonstrated the majority of practicing Jamaican physicians (72%) felt that they did not have adequate training in abortion care [6]. However, the majority of Jamaican general practitioners (GPs) and obstetrician-gynecologists (obgyns) report there should be greater availability of induced abortions, which would reduce maternal mortality.

In settings where abortion is legally protected research among medical students has demonstrated favorable attitudes, which may in turn correlate with intentions to provide abortion care and advocate for women. A study of students at the University of Washington found that 70% supported legal abortion under any circumstances. Thirty-one percent intended to provide medical abortion in their practice, and 18% planned to offer surgical abortion [7]. A study in South Africa found that 70% of students believed women should have access to abortion [8]. Additionally, studies have found that abortion education, training, and care can influence student’s attitudes towards abortion [9,10,11].

There is no published data regarding the attitudes of Caribbean medical students towards abortion. Our research sought to assess attitudes, training, exposure, intentions to provide, and legal knowledge regarding abortion access and care among University of the West Indies (UWI) medical students in Kingston, Jamaica. UWI is the largest medical school in the Caribbean, with approximately 315 students enrolled annually, the majority of graduates practice in the Caribbean. The medical school consists of five years of training, the first three years are basic science course-work, and the last two years are clinical clerkships. Approximately 60% of graduates go on to complete one year of postgraduate internship before becoming general practitioners [12].


From September to November 2017, we conducted an anonymous online cross-sectional survey of medical students enrolled at UWI. The UWI Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Einstein IRB approved the research. The UWI registrar’s office distributed electronic survey invitations and electronic consent was obtained. Research Electronic Database Capture (REDCap) was used to administer questions and compile data in an online portal. Duplicated questionaries’ where identified and deleted. As a descriptive survey, no power calculations were conducted and a sample of convenience was utilized.

The survey consisted of six domains: social and demographic characteristics, knowledge of the country’s abortion law, attitudes and beliefs about abortion provision, medical curriculum and training in abortion services, future abortion advocacy, and intention to provide abortion. The survey included questions from previously validated surveys, which have been described in the literature as well as new questions developed by the investigators [9]. The instrument was piloted among UWI faculty, and obgyn residents. In order to assess attitudes about abortion students were given a total of nine questions evaluating various reasons why a woman might seek and abortion. Student’s attitudes were scored from 1 to 5, for each scenario (eg. 1 = strongly disagree; 5 = strongly agree) [9]. An abortion attitudes sum score (AbAS) was calculated by totaling the responses, ranges of possible SS were 1 to 45. A favorable attitude towards abortion, was defined as an abortion attitudes sum score (AbAS) > or equal to 27.

Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were conducted using chi-square and t-tests or ANOVA, or their non-parametric equivalents. For analysis, clinical years of training were dichotomized into preclinical (years 1–3) vs. clinical (years 4–5), and intended specialty was divided into three categories - those who planned on being women health providers (obgyns and GPs), other specialties, and undecided. A multivariate linear regression model was developed in a stepwise fashion to identify associations between AbAS and individual characteristics. Any bivariate associations with the strength of association of at least p = 0.2 were assessed for inclusion in the multivariate model. Once an inclusive model was created, all contributing co-variates were assessed in a sequential fashion, if a variable no longer contributed equal to or greater than p < 0.05 it was removed. Once the model was finalized, assumptions of the multivariate linear regression model were evaluated and influential data (outliers) were removed.


Of the 1589 enrolled UWI medical students 1404 completed the survey for a response rate of 88%. The mean age was 22 and the majority identified as being single (61.9%), with only 4.3% being married. 597 (43%) identified as female, and 21% chose not to identify their gender (Table 1). Majority of the students were of African/ Afro-Caribbean descent (44%) with second most common race being mixed (18.7%). 54.7% of participants identifying as very religious. The most common religion was Christianity (72%) and 75% of students reported regular attendance at religious services. 71% of students reported personal exposure or knowing someone who have had an abortion. Majority of students intended to practice medicine in Jamaica (53.7%) or surrounding Caribbean nation (41.9%).

Table 1 Summary of Characteristics of Medical Students at University of West Indies (n = 1404)

The mean AbAS was 32, and the majority of participants believed abortion should be legal (88%). 74% agreed that abortion should be legal for rape or incest, 94% if pregnancy was a threat to a women’s physical health, 91% if it was a threat to a women’s mental health, 91% for fetal anomalies and 91% for a woman recently infected with zika virus (Table 2).

Table 2 University of the West Indies Medical Student Attitudes Towards Abortion

The majority of participants reported limited training or exposure to abortion care. 78.8% stated that abortion care has never been included in any portion of medical school, with only 13.6% participating in the care of a woman who has had an abortion. Among the 297 (22%) of students who reported some abortion training, lecture was the primary means of education (96.9%) (Table 3). For the limited students who participated in direct patient care, it typically consisted of the medical abortion (85.3%). Majority of the students denied any exposure to or involvement in the care of a patient with an illegal abortion 1326 (94.7%).

Table 3 Training on abortion among University of the West Indies Medical Students

Knowledge of the abortion law in Jamaica was limited. Approximately 65% of participants were unable to accurately identify one of the reasons a woman could legally access a therapeutic abortion in Jamaica, which includes threat to mental or physical health of a women. Students in their clinical years were more likely to identify any of these indications (64.8%) compared to students in the preclinical years (40.9%) p < 0.001 (Table 4).

Table 4 Knowledge about Abortion among University of the West Indies Medical Students

81% of students were willing to refer patients to other clinics and providers if a woman requested an abortion (Table 5). However, only 398 (28%) of medical students intended to incorporate medical or surgical abortion into their future practice. The most common reason for not intending to provide abortion was to not oppose the law (36.7%), and 659 (46%) of all medical students reported being willing to provide abortion if the legal restrictions were lifted. 345 (24.6%) of participants reported that they plan to practice as an obgyn or GP. Approximately half of these future women’s health providers intend to provide medical or surgical abortion care 159 (46%). 178 (52%) of future women’s health providers reported they would be willing to provide abortion care if the legal restrictions were changed.

Table 5 Intention to provide abortion by intended specialty among University of the West Indies Medical Students

The majority of respondents (N = 1113, 80%) agree that they would be willing to advocate for women’s health. However less than half of respondents (41%) stated they would be willing to advocate for abortion access and care in Jamaica. Slightly more students who intend to be women health providers are willing to advocate for change to the law to expand access to abortion care: 33% compared to 26% of persons pursuing other health specialties, p < 0.001.

The development of the model with sequential stepwise analysis of the cohort resulted in a more parsimonious model, which included a total of 13 characteristics. In the multivariate regression model co-variates that favorably impacted abortion attitudes sum score, included identifying as mixed raced, older age, not religious or reporting a personal or family history experience with abortion (Table 6). Covariates correlated with a lower score, and a more negative abortion attitude, included participants who identified as Afro-Caribbean, single, inaccurate knowledge of the abortion law, lack of abortion training, refusing to refer a patient for abortion care and a belief that abortion should not be legal.

Table 6 Multivariate Logistic Regression Model Regarding Abortion Attitude Sum Score and Associated Characteristics among University of the West Indies Medical Students


The majority of UWI medical students report favorable attitudes towards abortion in the setting of nationally restricted abortion access, and majority stated that abortion should be legal in Jamaica. These attitudes are comparable to those reported by medical students in the United States, where abortion is federally protected [13]. Internationally, favorable attitudes toward abortion have been noted among medical trainees at comparable levels in South Africa (70%), where abortion laws have changed in the last 22 years to be legally permissible for all indications up to 12 weeks [8]. Furthermore, acceptance and attitudes of students are comparable to the attitudes reported by Jamaican general practitioners surveyed in 2008 [6, 8, 14].

Comparable to previous research among general practitioners, current students report limited or absent exposure to or training in abortion care [6]. If students reported any training is was predominately in lecture format. This may not be the optimal format to engage in abortion education; pervious research among trainees and practitioners demonstrated that they would prefer, and stand to gain more impactful knowledge from, clinically applied and patient focused abortion care and management of complications through applied experiences [15].

The minority of students reported accurate knowledge of the legal status of abortion in Jamaica. Additionally, a third of participants though abortion was effectively illegal under any circumstances (including a threat to a mother’s life) and subject to persecution in Jamaica, with the concomitant concern that physician are penalized and incarcerated for participating in abortion care (32.5%). Consistent with these perceptions the majority of respondents stated that they would not be willing to provide abortions for fear of violating the law. The law serves as a tremendous deterrent to provision, and effectively is a means to re-stigmatize reproductive health care, by causing reproductive health providers to make practice decisions and medical decisions based on a potentially flawed and imperfect understanding of the law. Erroneous knowledge of legal restrictions, with concern for possible incarceration could be a real contributor to inadequate access to abortion care, inadequate management of complications, or lack of referral to abortion care in a country that experiences tremendous maternal morbidity from unsafe abortion.

Opportunities for improved educational experiences or values clarification workshops on abortion and abortion training could impact student’s readiness and willingness to engage in abortion related care. Furthermore education regarding the current legal indications for abortion may demystify, destigmitize, and decriminalize the scope of practice and engage students with evidence based, lifesaving, translatable skills related to abortion care as well as the medical management of septic abortion or miscarriage. Furthmore, students report that Jamaican women should have access to abortion through revision and changes in the laws. The majority of respondents have personal experience with abortion and the majority consider themselves to be women’s health advocates which also harnesses the potential for this community to implement effective women’s health policies and evidence-based care practices for the women of the Caribbean.

Religion is a potentially fixed and non-modifiable identity characteristic associated with medical professional abortion-related attitudes [8]. Previous research have suggested that health care providers recognize the distinction between personal and professional attitudes toward abortion, and believe that a personal religious objection does not impact on the provision of legal services to women, including nondirective counseling, referrals, and surgical and medication abortion [16, 17]. By contrast our research suggest that personal values impact attitudes and potentially practice because non- religious students (45.5%) had more favorable attitudes towards abortion (p < 0.001). Other research has demonstrated that personal experience and exposure to abortion impacts beliefs & perceptions, whereby “a broader understanding of the vagaries of existence that make abortions at times unavoidable” can impact attitudes toward abortion [8]. Our data demonstrate that personal experience with and or a family exposure to abortion were the most powerful and significant contributors to a favorable AbAS.


The strength of our research was the robust response rate, which in turn improved the fitness of our analysis and model development. We are confident that our results accurately represent the UWI medical student community, which comprise a diverse and international student body. We consider our findings to be representative of the attitudes of future Jamaican physicians and the surrounding West Indian Islands. We achieved a high level of response through the engagement of faculty and students, integration of the registrar and a collaborative stakeholder approach. Recruitment of medical students was done directly through course lectures, and other peer student’s recruitment. An additional strength is the instrument itself, which was designed carefully, piloted extensively, and tested for internal reliability and consistency.


As a survey this instrument was subjected to limitations related to self-reporting and recall bias. Researchers did not have the opportunity to longitudinally assess participants over time to see if these intentions and attitudes are reflective of practice patterns and abortion provision. Additionally, social desirability bias may have influenced people to identify more favourable intentions regarding reproductive rights. However, the confidential and de-identified nature of the survey was intended to minimize these concerns.


Medical students had favorable attitudes towards abortion. However, training in and exposure to abortion are extremely limited. Having prior personal experience with abortion was the most impactful predictor of favorable attitudes. Modifiable characteristics like training during medical school and an awareness of the current legal indications for abortion are opportunities to improve medical students awareness and attitudes regarding the public health impact abortion has on the women of Jamaica. These modifiable changes can combat unsafe abortion maternal mortality.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Abortion attitude sum score


General practitioners




University of the West Indies


UWI Institutional Review Board


Research Electronic Database Capture


  1. Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, et al. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016;388(10041):258–67.

  2. Singh S et al. Abortion Worldwide 2017: Uneven Progress and Unequal Access, New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2018. Accessed 22 Jan 2020.

  3. Aziza Ahmed CN, Maggie Schmeitz, Marsha Massiah. Maternal mortality, abortion,and health sector reform in four caribbean countries: Barbados,Jamaica,Suriname, and Trinidad and Tobago. Dawn Caribbean Aspire; 2005:82–84. (book).

  4. Jamaica, Government of 1953, “Offenses Against the Person Act 1861, Article 65-66.” In the law of Jamaica, volume 6. (revised edition). Kingston: Government Printer.

  5. Boersma AA, de Bruijn JG. Contraception and induced abortion in the West Indies: a review. West Indian Med J. 2011;60(5):564–70.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clark S, Blum J, Blanchard K, Galvao L, Fletcher H, Winikoff B. Misoprostol use in obstetrics and gynecology in Brazil, Jamaica, and the United States. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002;76(1):65–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fletcher H, Gordon-Strachan G, McFarlane S, Hamilton P, Frederick J. A survey of providers' knowledge, opinions, and practices regarding induced abortion in Jamaica. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113(3):183–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shotorbani S, Zimmerman FJ, Bell JF, Ward D, Assefi N. Attitudes and intentions of future health care providers toward abortion provision. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004;36(2):58–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wheeler SB, Zullig LL, Reeve BB, Buga GA, Morroni C. Attitudes and intentions regarding abortion provision among medical school students in South Africa. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012;38(3):154–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pace L, Sandahl Y, Backus L, Silveira M, Steinauer J. Medical students for Choice's reproductive health externships: impact on medical students' knowledge, attitudes and intention to provide abortions. Contraception. 2008;78(1):31–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Espey E, Ogburn T, Dorman F. Student attitudes about a clinical experience in abortion care during the obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Acad Med. 2004;79(1):96–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brock EN, Hardy-Fairbanks AJ, Stockdale CM. The effect of clinical clerkships on medical Students' attitudes toward abortion and contraception [181]. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125.

  13. Vaughan K, Samms-Vaughan M. The anatomy and physiology of the medical class of 1982a. West Indian Med J. 2008;57:621–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenheck RE, Feigal C, Brown N, Barcellos T, Bender N. Attitudes on abortion: a cross-sectional analysis of medical students in their preclinical years [3F]. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;127.

  15. Espey E, Ogburn T, Leeman L, Nguyen T, Gill G. Abortion education in the medical curriculum: a survey of student attitudes. Contraception. 2008;77(3):205–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Emmons S, Sells CW, Eiff MP. A review of medical and allied health learners' satisfaction with their training in women's health. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1259–65 discussion 1265-1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwarz EB, Luetkemeyer A, Foster DG, Weitz TA, Lindes D, Stewart FH. Willing and able? Provision of medication for abortion by future internists. Women's Health Issues. 2005;15(1):39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was funded by society of family planning. Funding for the use of REDCap was provided through the National Center for Research Resources, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through REDCap Grant 8UL1TR00086. Thanks to the UWI medical school and the students for participating in this study.

Conflict of interest

We have no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest.


This research was funded by the Society of Family Planning. Funding for the use of REDCap was provided through the National Center for Research Resources, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences through REDCap Grant 8UL1TR0086.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Glenmarie Matthews- primary investigator, main author of manuscript, design, conducts, data analysis. Jessica Atrio- design and manuscript. Horace Fletcher – local aid in conducting study. Nathalie Medley – local aid in conducting study. Leo Walker – local aid in conducting study. Nerys Benfield- aid in design and analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenmarie Matthews.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by both the Albert Einstein College of Medicine - Montefiore Medical Center Institutional Review Board and the Research Ethics Committee of the University of West Indies. The study was approved by both IRB from June 2017 to July 2018. The study adhered to the guidelines of the Good Clinical Practice. All data was de-identified. All participants consented prior to initiation of survey online.

Consent for publication

The Author grants the Publisher the sole and exclusive license of the full copyright in the Contribution, which license the Publisher hereby accepts. Consequently, the Publisher shall have the exclusive right throughout the world to publish and sell the Contribution in all languages, in whole or in part, including, without limitation, any abridgement and substantial part thereof, in book form and in any other form including, without limitation, mechanical, digital, electronic and visual reproduction, electronic storage and retrieval systems, including internet and intranet delivery and all other forms of electronic publication now known or hereinafter invented.

Competing interests

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matthews, G., Atrio, J., Fletcher, H. et al. Abortion attitudes, training, and experience among medical students in Jamaica, West Indies. Contracept Reprod Med 5, 4 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Abortion
  • Abortion attitude sum score (AbAs)
  • Medical students
  • Abortion training
  • And Jamaica abortion