Skip to main content

Determinants of male involvement in family planning services in Abia State, Southeast Nigeria

Abstract

Background

Male involvement in family planning (FP) remains low in male-dominant communities. Family planning contributes to the regulation of fertility and population growth in Nigeria. Increasing male involvement in family planning services is crucial in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality in patriarchal societies such as Nigeria. This study identified the determinants of male involvement in family planning services in Abia State, Nigeria.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in twelve communities of Abia State, Nigeria. A total of 588 married men who met the eligibility criteria were recruited using a multistage sampling technique. An interviewer-administered semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data on the variables. Univariate, bivariate and multivariate analysis was done. The level of significance was set at 5%.

Results

The overall level of active male involvement in family planning services was 55.1% (95% CI:51.0–59.2%). The mean age of the respondents was 42.4 ± 8.0 years. Access to television (aOR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.05–2.39), spouse employment status (aOR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.33–2.06), joint decision-making (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.05–2.62), and accompanying spouse to the FP clinic (aOR = 3.15, 95% CI: 2.16–4.62) were determinants of active male involvement.

Conclusion

At least, one out of every two men was actively involved in family planning services. This was determined by access to television, employment status of spouse, joint decision-making, and accompanying spouse to the FP clinic. There is a need to focus on the identified factors in order to further improve the active involvement of men in FP services.

Background

Family planning (FP) programmes have centered primarily on women. However, with a focus on gender equity for optimal health, there is a shift to engage men in supporting and using FP services [1]. Men, as the decision-makers in most African families, have an important role to play towards the utilization of FP methods, which is an efficacious intervention recommended and approved by the World Health Organization (WHO) as well as the Ministry of Health (MoH) in most countries [2]. Family planning refers to a conscious effort by a couple to limit or space the number of children they want to have through the use of contraceptive methods. Benefits of family planning include reduced maternal and infant mortality, sustainable development through population control, and enhanced women’s participation in the workforce [3].

Developing countries make up about 85% of the global population and account for 99% of all maternal mortality cases [4]. According to the 2018 National Demographic Health Survey (NDHS), the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) was 512 deaths/100,000 live births [5], and Nigeria accounts for approximately one-fifth of maternal deaths globally [6]. Additionally, the lifetime risk of maternal death in Nigeria is 0.029 (1 in 34) [5], compared to 1 in 4900 in most developed countries [6]. Low level of male involvement in reproductive health practices is one of the drivers of high maternal morbidity and mortality. This has reduced the impact of family planning interventions and intertwines with unregulated fertility that hinders economic development and creates a political imbalance in a country [7, 8].

Globally, there is a growing rise in the recognition of the benefits of involving men in family planning services [9]. It is known from research that gender dominance, particularly men’s disapproval of family planning, has an impact on the subdued prevalence of contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa [10]. A study done in Bangladesh documented a 40% male involvement rate [4], and a similar study carried out in Western Nigeria documented 39.6% [11]. This shows that male involvement remains low despite ongoing efforts. The effect of male dominance on the decision-making process heightens the poor indices of reproductive health, as documented in a study in Nigeria where 62% of women had their husbands as their decision-makers and only 6% of currently married women at the time of the survey made decisions for themselves [5]. Male involvement in SRH (Sexual and Reproductive Health) is an integrated approach engaging men as clients, partners, and agents of positive change in reproductive health issues [12].

Access to the media, television, and radio, spouse employment status, and average monthly income have all been identified as positive correlates of male involvement in studies [11, 13,14,15,16]. However, there is a paucity of data on the factors affecting the male involvement of men in family planning services in our study location. There is a need to generate data to inform decisions taken by policymakers in designing family planning programmes. Therefore, we aimed in this study to identify the determinants of male involvement in family planning services in Abia State.

Methods

Study design and setting

This was a community-based household cross-sectional study that was conducted from September to December 2019 in 12 communities of Abia State in southeastern Nigeria. The State had an estimated population of 3,901,620 in 2018 projected from the 2006 national population census with an annual growth rate of 2.7% [17]. Geopolitically, Abia State is divided into three Senatorial Zones—Abia North, Abia South, and Abia Central—with 17 Local Government Areas (LGAs) and has 291 political wards. Igbo language with varying dialects, and English are the major languages for communication. Abia State is inhabited mostly by the Igbo ethnic group, who are predominantly Christians with a few people who practice traditional religion. The Catholic doctrine forbids the use of modern family planning methods.

There are 517 public primary healthcare centres, 17 public secondary healthcare facilities, and two public tertiary healthcare centres. Family planning services are available across all health facilities and can be assessed at all levels of health facilities in the state, including chemist stores and private health facilities. There are no known existing taboos against family planning use in the state.

Sample size determination

Estimation of sample size was done using the sample size formula for cross-sectional studies [18]. A minimum sample size of 616 was determined at a confidence level of 95%, a design effect of 1.5 with a margin error of 5%. This was based on the proportion of male involvement in reproductive services (30.9%) in a previous study [11]. A non-response rate of 20% was assumed.

Study population and sampling strategy

The study population included men in a marital/cohabiting relationship with a spouse or partner in the selected communities. This category of men is believed to have had some experiences relating to reproductive health issues in marriage and/or fatherhood. Participants were included in the study if they met the eligibility criteria of being in the age group (15–59 years) as defined by NDHS 5, in a marital or cohabiting relationship, and living in the study area 6 months prior to the study. However, those with debilitating illnesses such as cerebrovascular diseases that could interfere with communication were excluded. A total of 616 men were recruited using the multistage sampling technique. Stage one: Six LGAs were selected using the balloting technique. They included Aba North, Umuahia North, Ohafia, Ugwunagbo, Bende, and Ikwuano LGAs. Stage two: In each LGA selected, the list of communities was obtained and they served as clusters. In each of the LGAs, two clusters were selected using a simple random sampling technique. Stage three: All the households in each cluster were enumerated. The respondents were proportionally allocated based on the number of households in each cluster. We used computer-generated random numbers to select the households. In each of the household visited, only one eligible respondent was selected. In households with more than one eligible respondent, simple random sampling was used to select only one of them. The process was continued until the required sample size was attained in each cluster.

Study tool and data collection process

A pre-tested interviewer-administered semi-structured questionnaire (Additional file 1) with open- and closed-ended questions was used to collect information from the participants by trained research assistants. The questionnaire was adapted from previous studies [11, 19]. The questionnaire was assessed for content and face validity and the Cronbach’s alpha index was 0.71. The Igbo translated version which was translated back to English to ensure that the original meaning was maintained, was also available for use. The questionnaire used for this study has three sections. "Background" SSection 1 addressed sociodemographic and socio-economic variables such as age, marriage type, educational status, occupational status, religion, and denomination, income, access to mass media, number of living children, educational status of spouse, and employment status of spouse. Section 2 included socio-cultural variables such as decision-maker on FP issues, accompanying spouse to FP clinic, and community and family support for accompanying spouse to FP clinic. Section 3 contained composite questions to measure the level of male involvement in family planning services. These included; Are you currently using any family planning method (s)? Have you ever discussed FP with your spouse/partner? Are you aware of any male FP method (s)? Have you ever attended any FP clinic? Have you ever discussed FP with a friend? And would you recommend FP to a friend?

There was no compensation for the respondents participating in this survey. Revisits was done up to three times to potential participants.

Quality control and data management

The research assistants were properly trained to ensure accuracy in data collection. The questionnaire was pre-tested to detect and correct possible errors and identify any ambiguities before the initiation of the study using sixty (60) respondents (10% of the study sample size) in Old Umuahia (Umuahia South LGA) which was not selected for the study,

Measurement of variables

The dependent variable was the level of male involvement in family planning services. It was created as a composite variable comprising six (6) questions covering respondents’ FP practices and FP perceptions. The responses were dichotomized (Yes/No), with a score of ‘No’ = 0 and ‘Yes’ = 1. This gave a maximal score of six (6) and a minimum score of zero (0). A total score of 0 was classified as ‘None involvement’, while a score of 1–3 was classified as ‘passive involvement’ and a score of 4–6 was classified as ‘active involvement’. For the logistic regression, a score of 0–3 was recoded as ‘passive involvement’. Additionally, active involvement was coded as ‘1’ and passive involvement coded as ‘0’ for the binary logistic regression analysis. The independent variables included age, educational status, occupational status, average monthly income, number of living children, educational status/employment status of spouse, decision-maker on FP issues, accompanying spouse to FP clinic, community and family support on accompanying spouse to FP clinic.

Statistical analysis

Data coding, entry, cleaning, and analysis was done using IBM SPSS statistics for Windows, version 20.0. We performed univariate analysis and determined the association between the independent variables and level of male involvement in family planning services using the binary logistic regression. The variables were dichotomized for ease of data analysis and interpretation. P values < 0.05 and 95% confidence interval excluding the null values were considered significant. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was done to identify the significant predictors of men’s involvement in family planning services. Factors that fitted into the regression model, were those with P values < 0.2 at the level of bivariate analysis. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated and the analysis was done based on a significance level of 5%. Appropriate charts and tables were used to display the results.

Results

Social-demographic characteristics of the study participants

A total of 588 respondents participated in the study with a response rate was 95.5%. The mean age of the study respondents was 42.2 ± 8.0 years. Respondents were almost distributed similarly between the 35–44 years age group (41.0%) and those aged over 45 years (41.2%). Two hundred and forty-one (41.0%) had secondary education with the majority (93.2%) of them in a monogamous relationship. The majority of the respondents (55.1%) had 3–4 living children. Five hundred and seventy-three (97.4%) were Christians with more than 40% belonging to the Pentecostal denomination. Close to one-third of the respondents (31.3%) were traders and 88.9% of them had resided in their abode for more than 2 years (Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of respondents

Proportion of agreed responses on male involvement in family planning services by indicators

A large majority of men (84.2%) had discussed FP with their spouses in the past 6 months prior to the study. The majority (70.4%) were aware of male-focused FP methods. Only 57.3% were currently using a FP method and 64.8% had discussed FP with their friends. In contrast, less than half of the men (49.3%) had ever attended a FP clinic and recommended FP to their friends (48.5%) in the past 6 months prior to the study. (Table 2).

Table 2 Proportion of agreed responses on male involvement in family planning services by indicators (N = 588)

Socio-economic/cultural characteristics of the respondents

Two hundred and forty-one (43.3%) were in the ≥₦60,000 monthly income category. The median income was ₦50,000 (IQR: ₦30,000–₦50,000). The majority of the respondents had access to - newspapers (66.3%), radio (88.3%) and television (68.2%). Two hundred and fifty-six of the respondents’ spouses (43.6%) had a minimum of tertiary education and the majority (62.9%) of them were employed. The majority of the respondents (78.6%) made joint-decisions with their spouses on FP issues. However, close to half (49.8%) of them agreed to accompany their spouse to the FP clinic. The majority of the respondents (92.0%) agreed that FP was not solely a woman’s responsibility and more than 75% of the respondents believed that FP was supported by family members and the community (Table 3).

Table 3 Socio-economic/cultural characteristics of the respondents

Factors associated with active male involvement in family planning services among the respondents

Among the respondents, 55.1% (95% CI: 51.0–59.2%) were active in FP services compared to 39.6% (95% CI: 35.6–43.7%) who were passive. However, 5.3% (95% CI: 3.6–7.4%) were not involved in any form of FP services.

The participants who had access to television were more likely to be active in family planning services compared to their counterparts. (OR = 1.70, 95%CI:1.20–2.40) Respondents whose spouses were employed were 90% more likely to be actively involved in FP compared to those whose spouses were not employed. (OR = 1.90, 95%CI:1.35–2.67) Respondents who had joint decision-making with their spouses on FP issues were also more likely to be involved actively in FP services compared to those whose spouses solely took decisions. (OR = 2.15, 95%CI:1.43–3.23) Active involvement was three-fold higher in men who agreed to accompany spouses to the FP clinic. (OR = 3.39, 95%CI:2.41–4.77).

There was a positive association with the active involvement and support of family members in accompanying spouse to the FP clinic. (OR = 1.78, 95%CI:1.20–2.64) Furthermore, those who believed that their community supported accompanying spouse to the FP clinic were 80% more likely than their counterparts to be active in male involvement (OR = 1.80, 95%CI: 1.18–2.75). (Table 4).

Table 4 Factors associated with active male involvement in family planning among the respondents (N = 588)

Predictors of active male involvement in family planning services

Male involvement in family planning services was predicted by access to television (aOR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.05–2.39), spouse employment status (aOR = 2.02, 95% CI: 1.33–2.06), joint decision-making (aOR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.05–2.62), and accompanying spouse to the FP clinic (aOR = 3.15, 95% CI: 2.16–4.62). (Table 5).

Table 5 Predictors of active male involvement among the respondents

Discussion

We conducted this study to determine the level of male involvement and its predictors in family planning services among men of Abia state, southeastern Nigeria. We found out that at least, one out of two men was active in FP services. Access to television, the spouse’s employment status, joint decision-making, and accompanying the spouse to the FP clinic were the predictors of male involvement in FP services.

The findings in this study showed that slightly more than half of the respondents were actively involved in FP services. This is in contrast to a study done in Ogun State, Nigeria, that noted an active involvement rate of 30.9% [11]. Additionally, researchers have reported lower rates of active involvement in Ghana (34.5%), Ethiopia (44%) and Bangladesh (40%) [4, 19, 20]. However, a recent study in Ethiopia reported a higher active involvement rate of 68%, while an earlier study in an urban municipality in Bangladesh noted a male involvement rate of 63.2% in FP [14, 21]. Poor involvement could be attributed to the patriarchal societies that exist in the African context, few male family planning methods and the prevailing myths and misconceptions associated with family planning use [8, 20, 22, 23]. Improving the services available for men and disseminating accurate information on the associated myths and misconceptions associated with FP services should be encouraged.

Access to television was a significant factor in determining active involvement in FP services by men. Access to the media is likely to enhance attitudes and behaviour change leading to improved male involvement in FP. Some researchers have also observed these findings in their various studies [11, 14, 24,25,26,27]. In Nigeria, the mass media play a crucial role in disseminating health information and increasing awareness about health education.13 This, over time, changes the attitude and behaviour of the masses to achieving optimal health [13]. Seeing FP messages on television and hearing them on the radio are associated with reported modern FP use [28]. The media plays an important role in attenuating the public perception of risks and provides a key link in the risk communication process. Efforts should be made to increase media coverage, especially in areas where they are not easily accessible.

The employment status of the spouse was a predictor in this study. This finding is consistent with the results of studies done in Ogun State and Bangladesh [11, 14]. Women who are employed are likely to be involved in decision-making [29]. Decision making is paramount in the uptake of reproductive health services. Additionally, women who are employed tend to plan their family size in such a way as to avoid hindrances to their services at their workplaces. Men should be encouraged to allow their spouses seek for jobs and women should be made to understand the benefits of getting employed.

Men who accompanied their wives to the FP clinic were more likely to use family planning services. This is consistent with a South African study which admitted that social support and joint responsibility for family planning and contraceptive use (FP/C) positively influence male participation [30]. However, the finding of a study in Osun State is at variance with this result [31]. Accompanying wife to FP clinic is likely to influence involvement in FP services because it is an outcome of spousal communication and joint decision making, which play a vital role in reproductive health issues.

Respondents who made joint decisions with their spouses or partners had an increased odds of being involved in family planning services. This is similar to findings from an earlier study conducted in Cross River State, Nigeria where the likelihood of using FP services increased when the decision was made jointly by both husband and wife [32]. This is also comparable to a study in Ethiopia which noted discussion with the spouse about FP issues to be a significant factor of male involvement [33]. A qualitative study in Malawi documented that joint decision-making in FP responsibilities is assisted by male involvement [34]. Furthermore, higher odds of male involvement were reported among men who jointly participated in decision-making with their partners [35]. Men are known to be culturally dominant and are expected to meet the sociocultural expectations and values attached to women and marriage [36, 37]. Men are beginning to accept the key messages of reproductive health services, and as such, take decisions that positively influence their involvement in FP practices.

The major strength of this study was that men were directly interviewed, instead of using their spouses as proxies. This gave the men better opportunities to express their opinions, ideas, and views more confidently. It was also a community-based study which would increase the generalizability of the study’s findings. Concurrently, the limitations of this study included: being a cross-sectional study, causal inferences cannot be conclusively made; the certainty of recall bias and social desirability bias. Additionally, there was no single index for measuring male involvement at the time of this study, this might have contributed to the variances observed with similar studies. These were, however, mitigated by assuring the respondents of their confidentiality and privacy, and an extensive literature review was done to select the suitable questions used for measuring the dependent variable.

Conclusion

The prevalence of active involvement in FP services was 55.1%. This was influenced by access to television, employment status of spouse, joint decision-making and accompanying spouse to the FP clinic. We recommend FP sensitization campaigns targeting men to encourage their participation in FP services. There is a need to improve the existing family planning programmes with a focus on the identified factors in order to enhance the active involvement of men in FP services.

Availability of data and materials

The dataset analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

aOR:

Adjusted Odds Ratio

CPR:

Contraceptive Prevalence Rate

FP/C:

Family planning/contraceptive use

FP:

Family Planning

ICPD:

International Conference on Population and Development

IQR:

Interquartile range

LGA:

Local government area

MMR:

Maternal Mortality Ratio

NDHS:

Nigeria Demographic Health Survey

NFELTP:

Nigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program

OR:

Odds ratio

SRH:

Sexual and Reproductive Health

TFR:

Total Fertility Rate

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Aluisio A, Richardson BA, Bosire R, John-Stewart G, Dorothy M-N, et al. Male engagement in family planning: USAID; 2017. p. 1–53. Available from: https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/publications/tr-17-203/at.../document%0A%0A

    Google Scholar 

  2. Msovela J, Tengia-Kessy A. Implementation and acceptability of strategies instituted for engaging men in family planning services in Kibaha district, Tanzania. Reprod Health. 2016;13:2–7 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27871299. Cited 2018 May 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Canning D, Schultz TP. The economic consequences of reproductive health and family planning. Lancet. 2012;380:165–71 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22784535. Cited 2018 Jun 30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bishwajit G, Tang S, Yaya S, Ide S, Fu H, Wang M, et al. Factors associated with male involvement in reproductive care in Bangladesh. BMC Public Health. 2017;17:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3915-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria]. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Nigeria: National Population Commission Abuja; 2019. p. 97–128.

    Google Scholar 

  6. WHO. WHO | maternal health in Nigeria: generating information for action: WHO; 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/maternal-health-nigeria/en/. Cited 2019 Dec 22

    Google Scholar 

  7. WHO, USAID. Repositioning Family Planning: Guidelines for advocacy action; 2008. p. 10–64.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koffi TB, Weidert K, Bitasse EO, Mensah MAE, Emina J, Mensah S, et al. Engaging men in family planning: perspectives from married men in Lomé, Togo. Glob Heal Sci Pract. 2018;6:316–27 Available from: www.ghspjournal.org. Cited 2018 Dec 20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Casey FE, Sonenstein FL, Astone NM, Pleck JH, Dariotis JK, Marcell AV. Family planning and preconception health among men in their mid-30s: developing indicators and describing need. Am J Mens Health. 2016;10:59–67 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4490119/pdf/nihms-700689.pdf. Cited 2018 Jun 26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Withers M, Dworkin SL, Onono M, Oyier B, Cohen CR, Bukusi EA, et al. Men’s perspectives on their role in family planning in Nyanza Province, Kenya. Stud Fam Plann. 2015;46:201–15 Available from: https://www.mendeley.com/research-papers/mens-perspectives-role-family-planning-nyanza-province-kenya-1/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ani F, Abiodun O, Sotunsa J, Faturoti O, Imaralu J, Olaleye A. Demographic factors related to male involvement in reproductive health care services in Nigeria. Eur J Contracept Reprod Heal Care. 2016;21:57–67 Available from: http://www.embase.com/search/results?subaction=viewrecord&from=export&id=L607666719%5Cnhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2015.1036856. Cited 2017 Aug 16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pascoe L, Herstad M, Shand T, van den Heever L. Building male involvement in SRHR: a basic model for male involvement in sexual and reproductive health and rights; 2012. p. 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ajaero CK, Odimegwu C, Ajaero ID, Nwachukwu CA. Access to mass media messages, and use of family planning in Nigeria: a spatio-demographic analysis from the 2013 DHS. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2979-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamal MM, Islam MS, Alam MS, Hassan ABME. Determinants of male involvement in family planning and reproductive health in Bangladesh. Am J Hum Ecol. 2013;2:83–93 Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj47LuSg5rTAhULsY8KHbzcAY4QFgguMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwscholars.com%2Findex.php%2Fajhe%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F0202_6%2Fpdf&usg=AFQjCNEAF3O8QbY-BD7aEoSb7w9MazNk7A&sig2=l.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ampt F, Mon MM, Than KK, Khin MM, Agius PA, Morgan C, et al. Correlates of male involvement in maternal and newborn health: a cross-sectional study of men in a peri-urban region of Myanmar. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:1–11 Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/15/122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ochako R, Mbondo M, Aloo S, Kaimenyi S, Thompson R, Temmerman M, et al. Barriers to modern contraceptive methods uptake among young women in Kenya: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Abia State Ministry of health. Abia State Strategic Health Development Plan (2010–2015); 2009. p. 15–7. Available from: http://www.mamaye.org.ng/sites/default/files/evidence/

    Google Scholar 

  18. Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research. Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35:121–6 Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3775042&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wiafe E. Male involvement in family planning in the Sunyani Municipality. Legon: University of Ghana, Legon; 2015. Available from: http://ugspace.ug.edu.gh. Accessed 22 Nov 2017

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kassa M, Abajobir AA, Gedefaw M. Level of male involvement and associated factors in family planning services utilization among married men in Debremarkos town, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Int Health Hum Rights [Internet]. 2014;14:1–8 Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4268790&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Demissie TW, Tegegne EM, Nigatu AM. Involvement in family planning service utilization and associated factors among married men at debre tabor town, Northwest Ethiopia, 2017. Pan Afr Med J. 2021;38 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34046117/. Cited 2021 Sep 2.

  22. Akinso O, Akinso S. Factors that influence male involvement in family planning: a qualitative study of men of reproductive age in Ibadan north-east and north-west, Oyo state. Contraception. 2015;92:395 Elsevier. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S001078241500414X. Cited 2018 Oct 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Iribhogbe OI, Akpamu U, Nwaopara AO, Osifo UC, Otamere HO, Okhiai O, et al. Contraceptive choice amongst married men in Ekpoma, Nigeria. African J Biomed Res. 2011;14:213–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Char A. Male involvement in family planning and reproductive health in Rural Central India. Finland: University of Tampere; 2011. Available from https://trepo.tuni.fi›bitstream. Cited 2017 Nov 20

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shahjahan M, Mumu SJ, Afroz A, Chowdhury HA, Kabir R, Ahmed K. Determinants of male participation in reproductive healthcare services: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2013;10:2–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ochako R, Temmerman M, Mbondo M, Askew I. Determinants of modern contraceptive use among sexually active men in Kenya. Reprod Health. 2017;14:1–15 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5408470/pdf/12978_2017_Article_316.pdf. Cited 2018 Jun 14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Westoff CF, Koffman DA. The association of television and radio with reproductive behavior. Popul Dev Rev. 2011;37:749–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Speizer IS, Corroon M, Calhoun LM, Gueye A, Guilkey DK. Association of men’s exposure to family planning programming and reported discussion with partner and family planning use: the case of urban Senegal. Plos One. 2018;13:2–15 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30252875/. Cited 2021 Sep 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Namdeo RP. Impact of education on decision-making ability of women. Educ Quest- An Int J Educ Appl Soc Sci. 2017;8:431–4.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kriel Y, Milford C, Cordero J, Suleman F, Beksinska M, Steyn P, et al. Male partner influence on family planning and contraceptive use: perspectives from community members and healthcare providers in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Reprod Health. 2019;16:89 Available from: https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-019-0749-y. Cited 2019 Nov 10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Adelekan A, Omoregie P, Edoni E. Male involvement in family planning: challenges and way forward. Int J Popul Res. 2014;2014:1–9 Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijpr/2014/416457/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Etokidem AJ, Ndifon W, Etowa J, Asuquo EF. Family planning practices of rural community dwellers in cross river state, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017;20:707–15 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt Ltd. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28656925. Cited 2018 Jun 14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Abose A, Adhena G, Dessie Y. Assessment of male involvement in long-acting and permanent contraceptive use of their partner in West Badewacho, Southern Ethiopia. Open Access J Contracept. 2021;12:63–72 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33664602/. Cited 2021 Sep 2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dral AA, Tolani MR, Smet E, Van Luijn A. Factors influencing male involvement in family planning in Ntchisi district, Malawi – a qualitative study. Afr J Reprod Health. 2018;22:35–43 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30632720/. Cited 2021 Sep 2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Rahman AE, Perkins J, Salam SS, Mhajabin S, Hossain AT, Mazumder T, et al. What do women want? An analysis of preferences of women, involvement of men, and decision-making in maternal and newborn health care in rural Bangladesh. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:2–12 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32183744/. Cited 2021 Sep 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kabagenyi A, Reid A, Ntozi J, Atuyambe L. Socio-cultural inhibitors to use of modern contraceptive techniques in rural Uganda: a qualitative study. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;25:1–30 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28292041. Cited 2018 Jun 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Davis J, Vyankandondera J, Luchters S, Simon D, Holmes W. Male involvement in reproductive, maternal and child health: a qualitative study of policymaker and practitioner perspectives in the Pacific. Reprod Health. 2016;13:2–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0184-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the research assistants for their hard work in the data collection. We also thank the study participants for their collaboration. A special thanks also goes to the Nigeria Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Program (NFELTP) and the Department of Community Medicine, Federal Medical Centre Umuahia, for their training and mentorship throughout the study period.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The study was conceived and designed by CIA, who was also in charge of the analysis, interpretation, and drafting of the manuscript. UNN and AU supervised the study, interpreted the data, and edited the manuscript. CDU and BNA contributed to the data interpretation and editing of the manuscript. UOA was responsible for data collection, data analysis and contributed to the design of the study. MSB contributed to data interpretation and editing of the manuscript. All authors revised the manuscript and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chidinma Ihuoma Amuzie.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics and Research Committee of the Federal Medical Centre, Umuahia with reference number FMC/QEH/G.596/Vol.10/301, and verbal permission was obtained from the paramount rulers (Eze) of the 12 communities to be studied. Written informed consent was taken from all the study participants before enrolment in the study.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declares that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

40834_2022_182_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Additional file 1.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Amuzie, C.I., Nwamoh, U.N., Ukegbu, A. et al. Determinants of male involvement in family planning services in Abia State, Southeast Nigeria. Contracept Reprod Med 7, 15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00182-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-022-00182-z

Keywords

  • Determinants
  • Family planning services
  • Male involvement
  • Nigeria